Rural-preservation zoning locks up supply; a tiny, quiet acreage enclave off the D'Aguilar corridor.
With ~23 residents and no market or rental signal, there is effectively nothing to underwrite for a fund.
Creek-flat and one-road access are inferred risks; large-lot upkeep is off-limits to LRBA borrowing.
Not investable for an SMSF: no market, no tenants, no liquidity. Pass on the numbers.
| Dimension | Verdict | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Flood risk | ◐ Mixed | Tiny rural creek-flat locality; road-isolation exposure inferred from catchment, no per-suburb flood data — check at address level. flood factpack |
| Crime | ◐ Mixed | No suburb-level rate data (Woodford/Kilcoy police divisions); tiny rural population, no reliable signal — verify on the QPS crime map. QPS crime map (verify) |
| Infrastructure | ✗ Bad | Tiny rural locality ~25-30min to Woodford/Caboolture; no retail, rail or hospital. Transport factpack |
| Owner-occupier appeal | ✓ Good | 100% owned / 0% rented, 100% family households — owner-occupier depth supports prices and resale; verify tenant demand separately (listings volume, room demand). ABS via suburb page |
| New supply risk | ✓ Good | Rural zoning under the 75%-rural-preservation policy; no pipeline — structural scarcity. supply factpack |
| Distance to rail | ✗ Bad | No station; nearest heavy rail Caboolture ~25-30min. Translink network |
| Housing stock & upkeep | ✗ Bad | Rural acreage on septic; large-lot upkeep is an ongoing, LRBA-uncovered cost. editorial — stock-age judgment |
| 2 bed | 3 bed | 4 bed | 5+ bed | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median price | — | — | — | — |
| Median rent | — | — | — | — |
| Implied yield | — | — | — | — |